- android.gs
- Compare
- X9c vs Zero 40
Honor X9c vs Infinix Zero 40
What X9c does better (8) and where Zero 40 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9cZero 40
| X9c | Zero 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9c better than Zero 40?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+32%
- Stereo speakersYes · Zero 40: No
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 393 ppi+11%
- Weight189 g vs 195 g+3%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is Zero 40 better than X9c?
- AnTuTu score760,332 vs 1,315,468+73%
- Wireless chargingNo · X9c: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,719 vs 3,932+45%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X9c: Yes
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 72%+89%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Purple, Titanium Black, Jade Cyan | Rock Black, Violet Garden, Moving Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 89.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 760,332 | 1,315,468 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,719 | 3,932 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 72% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 20 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
