- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 30 vs Aquos sense7 plus
Infinix Zero 30 vs Sharp Aquos sense7 plus
What Zero 30 does better (15) and where Aquos sense7 plus wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display7.8
9.3Camera6.7
7.3Battery7.3
6.3Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 30Aquos sense7 plus
| Zero 30 | Aquos sense7 plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 160 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 172 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 30 better than Aquos sense7 plus?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Aquos sense7 plus: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos sense7 plus: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Aquos sense7 plus better than Zero 30?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Stereo speakersNo · Zero 30: Yes
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
- Memory card slotNo · Zero 30: Yes
- eSIMNo · Zero 30: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Zero 30: Yes
- Weight185 g vs 172 g+8%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 403 ppi+4%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple | Moon silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IGZO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 764 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 82.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,016 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,952 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,050 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 68 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | — |
