- android.gs
- Compare
- X9b vs Zero 30
Honor X9b vs Infinix Zero 30
What X9b does better (7) and where Zero 30 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9bZero 30
| X9b | Zero 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 164.5 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 185 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9b better than Zero 30?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- AnTuTu score701,054 vs 635,016+10%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 950 nits+26%
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 388 ppi+11%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is Zero 30 better than X9b?
- Wired charging35 W vs 68 W+94%
- Optical stabilisationNo · X9b: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,796 vs 2,952+6%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X9b: Yes
- Charged in 30 min40% vs 80%2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 764 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 701,054 | 635,016 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | 2,952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 8.0 | XOS 13 |
