- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 30 vs Poco F5
Infinix Zero 30 vs Xiaomi Poco F5
What Zero 30 does better (8) and where Poco F5 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 30Poco F5
| Zero 30 | Poco F5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 161.1 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 30 better than Poco F5?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F5: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 65%+23%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Poco F5 better than Zero 30?
- AnTuTu score635,016 vs 931,174+47%
- Stereo speakersNo · Zero 30: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,952 vs 3,939+33%
- Measured brightness764 nits vs 963 nits+26%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Zero 30: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+12%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,000 nits+5%
- Weight185 g vs 181 g+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26.6 LUFS vs -24.3 LUFS+-9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 764 nits | 963 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 88.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,016 | 931,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,952 | 3,939 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.6 LUFS | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | HyperOS |
