- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 60 Pro vs Y400
Infinix Hot 60 Pro vs Vivo Y400
What Hot 60 Pro does better (10) and where Y400 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display8.4
5.2Camera5.9
7.8Battery9.0
5.4Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 60 ProY400
| Hot 60 Pro | Y400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 162.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 7.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 197 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 60 Pro better than Y400?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- NFCYes · Y400: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Y400: No
- Weight170 g vs 197 g+16%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 395 ppi+11%
- Thickness6.6 mm vs 7.9 mm+20%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Y400 better than Hot 60 Pro?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- 5GNo · Hot 60 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min68% vs 75%+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Sapphire Blue, Jungle Breath, Orange Rose Valley | Glam White, Olive Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 87.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 608,673 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,927 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15.1 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
