- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 60 Pro vs Pova 7 4G
Infinix Hot 60 Pro vs Tecno Pova 7 4G
What Hot 60 Pro does better (12) and where Pova 7 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
9.6Display9.0
4.6Performance4.5
5.2Camera5.6
7.8Battery8.8
5.4Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 60 ProPova 7 4G
| Hot 60 Pro | Pova 7 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 168.6 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 9.3 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 203 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 60 Pro better than Pova 7 4G?
- AnTuTu score608,673 vs 573,915+6%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight170 g vs 203 g+19%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 396 ppi+11%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Thickness6.6 mm vs 9.3 mm+41%
- Charged in 30 min68% vs 52%+31%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 84.5%+6%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Pova 7 4G better than Hot 60 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+36%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,927 vs 2,014+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Sapphire Blue, Jungle Breath, Orange Rose Valley | Hyper Titanium, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 608,673 | 573,915 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,927 | 2,014 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15.1 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
