- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 60 Pro vs T4x
Infinix Hot 60 Pro vs Vivo T4x
What Hot 60 Pro does better (15) and where T4x wins (8) — every spec side by side.
9.6Display7.0
4.6Performance6.0
5.2Camera5.4
7.8Battery8.4
5.4Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 60 ProT4x
| Hot 60 Pro | T4x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 165.7 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 8.1 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 204 g | −34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 60 Pro better than T4x?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,050 nits4.3×
- OLED panelYes · T4x: No
- NFCYes · T4x: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Memory card slotYes · T4x: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T4x: No
- Weight170 g vs 204 g+20%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 393 ppi+12%
- Charged in 30 min68% vs 38%+79%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Thickness6.6 mm vs 8.1 mm+23%
Why is T4x better than Hot 60 Pro?
- AnTuTu score608,673 vs 821,707+35%
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+26%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,927 vs 2,842+47%
- 5GNo · Hot 60 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 6.6 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Sapphire Blue, Jungle Breath, Orange Rose Valley | Pronto Purple, Marine Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 608,673 | 821,707 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,927 | 2,842 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15.1 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
