- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Blade A75
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs ZTE Blade A75
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (13) and where Blade A75 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display5.7
4.6Camera5.4
6.0Battery4.6
4.2Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro 4GBlade A75
| Hot 50 Pro 4G | Blade A75 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 163.6 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.9 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Blade A75?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Blade A75: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade A75: No
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 266 ppi+48%
- Memory card slotYes · Blade A75: No
- Weight190 g vs 206 g+8%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.6 mm+16%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is Blade A75 better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- 5GNo · Hot 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | Black, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Unisoc T760 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.66.7
vs
Infinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G7.66.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro6.76.6

