- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Y37 Pro
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Vivo Y37 Pro
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (12) and where Y37 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display6.2
4.6Camera4.1
6.0Battery8.2
4.2Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro 4GY37 Pro
| Hot 50 Pro 4G | Y37 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 165.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 199 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Y37 Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Y37 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Y37 Pro: No
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,000 nits+80%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 264 ppi+49%
- Memory card slotYes · Y37 Pro: No
- Weight190 g vs 199 g+5%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min56% vs 42%+33%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 4.2+29%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8 mm+8%
Why is Y37 Pro better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- 5GNo · Hot 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging33 W vs 44 W+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,608 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | OriginOS 4 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vsSamsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vsSamsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.66.7
vsInfinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G7.66.7
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro6.76.6