- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Pova 6 Neo 5G
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Tecno Pova 6 Neo 5G
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (6) and where Pova 6 Neo 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display5.8
4.6Camera5.9
6.0Battery4.6
4.2Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro 4GPova 6 Neo 5G
| Hot 50 Pro 4G | Pova 6 Neo 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 165.4 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.8 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Pova 6 Neo 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Pova 6 Neo 5G: No
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 263 ppi+49%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%
Why is Pova 6 Neo 5G better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- 5GNo · Hot 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | Azure Sky, Midnight Shadow, Aurora Cloud |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vsSamsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vsSamsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.66.7
vsInfinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G7.66.7
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro6.76.6