- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 40 Pro vs Moto G84
Infinix Hot 40 Pro vs Motorola Moto G84
What Hot 40 Pro does better (9) and where Moto G84 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display8.0
4.2Performance4.0
6.6Camera8.0
5.1Battery4.3
6.2Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 40 ProMoto G84
| Hot 40 Pro | Moto G84 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 160 mm | +8.6 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.4 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 167 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 40 Pro better than Moto G84?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score428,551 vs 389,015+10%
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,975 vs 1,824+8%
- Active use (test)12.9 h vs 12.5 h+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 54%+19%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Moto G84 better than Hot 40 Pro?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,300 nits2.6×
- OLED panelNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- Measured brightness534 nits vs 996 nits+87%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 167 g+19%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 405 ppi+2%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.6 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Palm Blue, Horizon Gold, Starlit Black, Starfall Green, Free Fire | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 534 nits | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 428,551 | 389,015 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,975 | 1,824 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.9 h | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.5 LUFS | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13.5 | My UX |
