- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 40 Pro vs Redmi Note 12 4G
Infinix Hot 40 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
What Hot 40 Pro does better (8) and where Redmi Note 12 4G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display8.0
4.2Performance3.6
6.6Camera6.2
5.1Battery6.0
6.2Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 40 ProRedmi Note 12 4G
| Hot 40 Pro | Redmi Note 12 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 165.7 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 40 Pro better than Redmi Note 12 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score428,551 vs 319,219+34%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 12 4G: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,975 vs 1,797+10%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.5 LUFS vs -27.9 LUFS+-12%
Why is Redmi Note 12 4G better than Hot 40 Pro?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,200 nits2.4×
- OLED panelNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- Measured brightness534 nits vs 744 nits+39%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 40 Pro: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 184 g+8%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Palm Blue, Horizon Gold, Starlit Black, Starfall Green, Free Fire | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 534 nits | 744 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 428,551 | 319,219 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,975 | 1,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.5 LUFS | -27.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.9 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13.5 | HyperOS |
