- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 30 5G vs Galaxy A24 4G
Infinix Hot 30 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
What Hot 30 5G does better (6) and where Galaxy A24 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display7.0
4.6Camera7.8
4.6Battery5.3
4.6Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 30 5GGalaxy A24 4G
| Hot 30 5G | Galaxy A24 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.5 mm | 162.1 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 77.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 195 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 30 5G better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A24 4G: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.7% vs 82.4%+3%
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Hot 30 5G?
- OLED panelNo · Hot 30 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Hot 30 5G: Yes
- NFCNo · Hot 30 5G: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Peak brightness580 nits vs 1,000 nits+72%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 30 5G: Yes
- Weight215 g vs 195 g+10%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Thickness9.2 mm vs 8.3 mm+11%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 168.5 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Knight Black, Aurora Blue | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 580 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,012 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 82.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 398,005 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 344 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 46% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.41 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
