- android.gs
- Compare
- X9a vs Poco F5 Pro
Honor X9a vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
What X9a does better (3) and where Poco F5 Pro wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display8.6
4.8Performance7.6
6.9Camera9.2
7.5Battery8.6
7.1Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9aPoco F5 Pro
| X9a | Poco F5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 162.8 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 75.4 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 204 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9a better than Poco F5 Pro?
- Weight175 g vs 204 g+17%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 87.5%+3%
Why is Poco F5 Pro better than X9a?
- AnTuTu score605,759 vs 1,057,977+75%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,057 vs 4,001+95%
- Wired charging40 W vs 67 W+68%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X9a: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · X9a: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X9a: Yes
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,400 nits+75%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 526 ppi+33%
- Measured brightness859 nits vs 1,059 nits+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 859 nits | 1,059 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 605,759 | 1,057,977 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,057 | 4,001 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,110 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | HyperOS 3 |
