How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F5 Pro vs Poco F7 Pro

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

What Poco F5 Pro does better (3) and where Poco F7 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Xiaomi · 2023Poco F5 Pro
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $400
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Pro
9.3Score
15 advantages≈ $580
Higher score
8.6Display9.1
7.6Performance8.6
9.2Camera9.0
8.6Battery8.1
6.9Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F5 ProPoco F7 Pro
75.4 × 162.88.675 × 160.38.1
Poco F5 ProPoco F7 ProDifference
Height162.8 mm160.3 mm+2.5 mm
Width75.4 mm75 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness8.6 mm8.1 mm+0.5 mm
Weight204 g206 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F5 Pro better than Poco F7 Pro?

  1. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
  2. Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
  3. Charged in 30 min100% vs 81%+23%

Why is Poco F7 Pro better than Poco F5 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score1,057,977 vs 2,065,265+95%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
  3. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,110 vs 4,9212.3×
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,001 vs 6,661+66%
  5. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,200 nits2.3×
  6. Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
  7. Wired charging67 W vs 90 W+34%
  8. Measured brightness1,059 nits vs 1,478 nits+40%
  9. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
  10. Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  12. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight204 g206 g
Thickness8.6 mm8.1 mm
Height162.8 mm160.3 mm
Width75.4 mm75 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP53IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx3IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, WhiteBlack, Blue, Silver
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px3,200 px
Pixel density526 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness1,059 nits1,478 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.5%89.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 750
AnTuTu score1,057,9772,065,265
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,0016,661
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,1104,921
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera64 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,160 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.8 h
Wired charging67 W90 W
Charged in 30 min100%81%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-26.2 LUFS-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)1 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 3HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—70 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare