- android.gs
- Compare
- X9a vs Camon 20 Premier
Honor X9a vs Tecno Camon 20 Premier
What X9a does better (5) and where Camon 20 Premier wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.6
4.8Performance5.7
6.9Camera8.3
7.5Battery6.8
7.1Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9aCamon 20 Premier
| X9a | Camon 20 Premier | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 161.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 202 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9a better than Camon 20 Premier?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Measured brightness859 nits vs 684 nits+26%
- Weight175 g vs 202 g+16%
- Charged in 30 min57% vs 47%+21%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Why is Camon 20 Premier better than X9a?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,057 vs 3,074+49%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X9a: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X9a: Yes
- AnTuTu score605,759 vs 673,809+11%
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 900 nits+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 161.9 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Leather |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 859 nits | 684 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 605,759 | 673,809 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,057 | 3,074 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | HIOS 14 |
