- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Premier vs V27
Tecno Camon 20 Premier vs Vivo V27
What Camon 20 Premier does better (8) and where V27 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.7
5.7Performance5.8
8.3Camera9.1
6.8Battery5.7
8.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 PremierV27
| Camon 20 Premier | V27 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.1 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 180 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Premier better than V27?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · V27: No
- AnTuTu score673,809 vs 613,641+10%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,074 vs 2,400+28%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V27 better than Camon 20 Premier?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging45 W vs 66 W+47%
- Measured brightness684 nits vs 1,055 nits+54%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Camon 20 Premier: Yes
- Weight202 g vs 180 g+12%
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,000 nits+11%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 79%+68%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Leather | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 684 nits | 1,055 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 673,809 | 613,641 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,074 | 2,400 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,158 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.8 LUFS | -28.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | Funtouch 13 |
