- android.gs
- Compare
- X8b vs V29 Pro
Honor X8b vs Vivo V29 Pro
What X8b does better (6) and where V29 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8bV29 Pro
| X8b | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 164.2 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 188 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8b better than V29 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,300 nits+54%
- Weight166 g vs 188 g+13%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V29 Pro better than X8b?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,475 vs 3,9992.7×
- Wired charging35 W vs 80 W2.3×
- AnTuTu score396,111 vs 682,257+72%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · X8b: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · X8b: Yes
- 5GNo · X8b: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+2%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Colours | Glamorous Green, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black, Blue | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 90.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 396,111 | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,475 | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
