- android.gs
- Compare
- X8b vs Camon 20 Pro
Honor X8b vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What X8b does better (13) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display7.2
3.6Performance4.4
7.6Camera6.4
4.2Battery6.0
3.5Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8bCamon 20 Pro
| X8b | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.4 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.8 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 190 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8b better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 500 nits4×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Weight166 g vs 190 g+14%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 38%+32%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.8 mm+15%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than X8b?
- AnTuTu score396,111 vs 574,290+45%
- NFCNo · X8b: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X8b: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,475 vs 1,953+32%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · X8b: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X8b: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Glamorous Green, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black, Blue | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 396,111 | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,475 | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | HIOS 14 |
