- android.gs
- Compare
- X7c 4G vs Moto G55
Honor X7c 4G vs Motorola Moto G55
What X7c 4G does better (7) and where Moto G55 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7c 4GMoto G55
| X7c 4G | Moto G55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 161.6 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 73.8 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.1 mm | = |
| Weight | 194 g | 179 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7c 4G better than Moto G55?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 405 nits2.1×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging35 W vs 30 W+17%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+12%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
Why is Moto G55 better than X7c 4G?
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- 5GNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 405 ppi+55%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- eSIMNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Weight194 g vs 179 g+8%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 161.6 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green, Moonlight White | Forest Grey, Smoky Green, Twilight Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 405 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 868 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 630,214 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,366 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 52 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
