- android.gs
- Compare
- X7c 4G vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Honor X7c 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
What X7c 4G does better (3) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display8.2
5.6Camera8.5
8.0Battery5.1
5.5Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7c 4GRedmi Note 13 Pro 4G
| X7c 4G | Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 161.1 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 188 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7c 4G better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better than X7c 4G?
- Wired charging35 W vs 67 W+91%
- Main camera108 MP vs 200 MP+85%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,300 nits+53%
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 395 ppi+51%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X7c 4G: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight194 g vs 188 g+3%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green, Moonlight White | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,047 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 88.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 382,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,844 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 94% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
