- android.gs
- Compare
- X40 GT vs Moto G200 5G
Honor X40 GT vs Motorola Moto G200 5G
What X40 GT does better (6) and where Moto G200 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
6.1Camera7.6
5.8Battery6.0
7.9Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X40 GTMoto G200 5G
| X40 GT | Moto G200 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 168.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 202 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X40 GT better than Moto G200 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 33 W2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.9 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 86.5%+3%
Why is Moto G200 5G better than X40 GT?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X40 GT: Yes
- Max video4K vs 8K
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.99 GHz+5%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 168.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Racing Black, Black, Silver | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 558 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 86.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.99 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 682,346 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,319 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | — |
