- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Smart vs Hot 50 Pro 4G
Honor 90 Smart vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
What 90 Smart does better (4) and where Hot 50 Pro 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display8.8
3.7Performance4.4
5.6Camera4.6
7.7Battery6.0
8.1Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 SmartHot 50 Pro 4G
| 90 Smart | Hot 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.7 mm | 167 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Smart better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- 5GYes · Hot 50 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity5,330 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+7%
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than 90 Smart?
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,800 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · 90 Smart: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- AnTuTu score532,792 vs 562,039+5%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,910 vs 1,992+4%
- Memory card slotNo · 90 Smart: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 166.7 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 86.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 532,792 | 562,039 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,910 | 1,992 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,330 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic OS 7.2 | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 1 |
