- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Pro vs iQOO Neo 7
Honor 90 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 7
What 90 Pro does better (18) and where iQOO Neo 7 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display8.1
8.1Performance7.6
8.2Camera7.9
7.6Battery7.8
8.7Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 ProiQOO Neo 7
| 90 Pro | iQOO Neo 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 164.8 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 76.9 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 193 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Pro better than iQOO Neo 7?
- Main camera200 MP vs 64 MP3.1×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- AnTuTu score1,463,370 vs 1,241,266+18%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,464 vs 3,292+36%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,835 vs 1,790+58%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,300 nits+23%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
Why is iQOO Neo 7 better than 90 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging90 W vs 120 W+33%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%
- Charged in 30 min112% vs 150%+34%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 87.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,463,370 | 1,241,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,464 | 3,292 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,835 | 1,790 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | 150% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.1 | Funtouch 13 |
