android.gs
Compare
90 Pro vs 13 Ultra

Honor 90 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra

What 90 Pro does better (7) and where 13 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 202390 Pro

9.0Score

7 advantages≈ $480

Xiaomi · 202313 Ultra

9.2Score

15 advantages≈ $420

Higher score

8.9Display8.8

8.1Performance8.1

8.2Camera9.7

7.6Battery6.3

8.7Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

90 Pro13 Ultra

	90 Pro	13 Ultra	Difference
Height	163.8 mm	163.2 mm	+0.6 mm
Width	74.9 mm	74.6 mm	+0.3 mm
Thickness	8.1 mm	9.1 mm	−1 mm
Weight	192 g	227 g	−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 90 Pro better than 13 Ultra?

Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
AnTuTu score1,463,370 vs 1,268,538+15%
4K selfie videoYes · 13 Ultra: No
Weight192 g vs 227 g+18%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Charged in 30 min112% vs 86%+30%
Thickness8.1 mm vs 9.1 mm+12%

Why is 13 Ultra better than 90 Pro?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Pro: Yes
Optical zoom2.5× vs 5×2×
Wireless chargingNo · 90 Pro: Yes
Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 2,600 nits+62%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,464 vs 5,049+13%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,835 vs 3,488+23%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Pixel density437 ppi vs 522 ppi+19%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 90 Pro≈ $4809.0	Xiaomi 13 Ultra≈ $4209.2
Design
Weight	192 g	227 g
Thickness	8.1 mm	9.1 mm
Height	163.8 mm	163.2 mm
Width	74.9 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Eco leather
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue	Black, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,700 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	437 ppi	522 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,207 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.9%	89.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	1,463,370	1,268,538
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,464	5,049
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,835	3,488
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	200 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.4"	1"
Rear cameras	3	4
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2.5×	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	10.2 h
Wired charging	90 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	112%	86%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 7.1	HyperOS