- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Pro vs Phantom X2
Honor 90 Pro vs Tecno Phantom X2
What 90 Pro does better (16) and where Phantom X2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display8.6
8.1Performance7.0
8.2Camera9.2
7.6Battery7.8
8.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 ProPhantom X2
| 90 Pro | Phantom X2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 164.6 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 72.7 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 203 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Pro better than Phantom X2?
- Main camera200 MP vs 64 MP3.1×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging90 W vs 45 W2×
- AnTuTu score1,463,370 vs 973,623+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Phantom X2: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,464 vs 4,027+11%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom X2: No
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 387 ppi+13%
- Weight192 g vs 203 g+6%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Why is Phantom X2 better than 90 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 93.3%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 710 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,463,370 | 973,623 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,464 | 4,027 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,835 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.1 | HiOS 8.6 |
