- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Pro vs GT5 240W
Honor 90 Pro vs Realme GT5 240W
What 90 Pro does better (10) and where GT5 240W wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 ProGT5 240W
| 90 Pro | GT5 240W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.1 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 205 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Pro better than GT5 240W?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Telephoto cameraYes · GT5 240W: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoYes · GT5 240W: No
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,400 nits+14%
- Weight192 g vs 205 g+7%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 88.8%+2%
Why is GT5 240W better than 90 Pro?
- Wired charging90 W vs 240 W2.7×
- RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 451 ppi+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Flowing Silver, Starry Oasis |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 451 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,463,370 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,464 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,835 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 240 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.1 | — |
