- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Pro vs GT Neo 5 240W
Honor 90 Pro vs Realme GT Neo 5 240W
What 90 Pro does better (10) and where GT Neo 5 240W wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display9.3
8.2Camera8.6
7.6Battery6.8
8.7Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 ProGT Neo 5 240W
| 90 Pro | GT Neo 5 240W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Pro better than GT Neo 5 240W?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Telephoto cameraYes · GT Neo 5 240W: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoYes · GT Neo 5 240W: No
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,400 nits+14%
- Weight192 g vs 199 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 87.9%+3%
Why is GT Neo 5 240W better than 90 Pro?
- Wired charging90 W vs 240 W2.7×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min112% vs 375%3.3×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+6%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 451 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Purple, Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 451 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 87.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,463,370 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,464 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,835 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 240 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | 375% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.1 | realme UI 4.0 |
