- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Pro vs 21
Honor 90 Pro vs Meizu 21
What 90 Pro does better (9) and where 21 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 Pro21
| 90 Pro | 21 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 156.7 mm | +7.1 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 198 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Pro better than 21?
- Telephoto cameraYes · 21: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+4%
- Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 393 ppi+11%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
- Weight192 g vs 198 g+3%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is 21 better than 90 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Pro: Yes
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 1,800 nits+12%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.9 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 156.7 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue | Black, Purple, Green, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,463,370 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,464 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,835 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.1 | Flyme 10.5 |
