- android.gs
- Compare
- 80 Pro Flat vs V29 Pro
Honor 80 Pro Flat vs Vivo V29 Pro
What 80 Pro Flat does better (7) and where V29 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.2
7.6Camera8.4
5.8Battery4.8
8.7Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
80 Pro FlatV29 Pro
| 80 Pro Flat | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.2 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 74.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 188 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 80 Pro Flat better than V29 Pro?
- Main camera160 MP vs 50 MP3.2×
- NFCYes · V29 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · V29 Pro: No
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+4%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 83%+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V29 Pro better than 80 Pro Flat?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 80 Pro Flat: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · 80 Pro Flat: Yes
- Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,300 nits+30%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.5 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 90.8%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, Pink | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 90.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 160 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
