- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 SE vs Galaxy M52 5G
Honor 50 SE vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What 50 SE does better (6) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.8
7.3Camera7.5
4.3Battery5.3
5.8Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 SEGalaxy M52 5G
| 50 SE | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.7 mm | 164.2 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 SE better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min112% vs 30%3.7×
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 86.4%+3%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than 50 SE?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- OLED panelNo · 50 SE: Yes
- NFCNo · 50 SE: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · 50 SE: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · 50 SE: Yes
- Weight191 g vs 173 g+10%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.4 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.7 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 112% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.2 | One UI 5.1 |
