- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Razr 2022
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr 2022
What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (19) and where Razr 2022 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display7.4
6.3Performance4.3
8.0Camera7.1
4.8Battery2.8
9.3Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 9 Pro FoldRazr 2022
| Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Razr 2022 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155.2 mm | 167 mm | −11.8 mm |
| Width | 150.2 mm | 79.8 mm | +70.4 mm |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm | 7.6 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 257 g | 200 g | +57 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than Razr 2022?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+33%
- AnTuTu score1,222,228 vs 965,260+27%
- Measured brightness2,199 nits vs 1,033 nits2.1×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Razr 2022: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Razr 2022: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783 vs 3,944+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Razr 2022: No
- Screen size8″ vs 6.7″+19%
- Resolution (width)2,076 px vs 1,080 px+92%
Why is Razr 2022 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
- Wired charging21 W vs 30 W+43%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 32 MP3.2×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Weight257 g vs 200 g+28%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density373 ppi vs 393 ppi+5%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 257 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 155.2 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 150.2 mm | 79.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Obsidian, Porcelain | Satin Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 2,076 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,152 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 373 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,700 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 2,199 nits | 1,033 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 81.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,222,228 | 965,260 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,783 | 3,944 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,620 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,650 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 21 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.1 LUFS | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.98 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold67.47.3
vsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold8.57.4vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsXiaomi Mix Flip7.48.1vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsHonor Magic V27.47.6vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsHonor Magic V Flip7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4vsMotorola Razr 20226.15.9