How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 2022 vs Galaxy Z Fold4

Motorola Razr 2022 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

What Razr 2022 does better (7) and where Galaxy Z Fold4 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 2022
Motorola · 2022Razr 2022
5.9Score
7 advantages≈ $720
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
Samsung · 2022Galaxy Z Fold4
6.1Score
13 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
7.4Display3.6
4.3Performance4.4
7.1Camera7.6
2.8Battery4.3
4.0Features6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 2022Galaxy Z Fold4
79.8 × 1677.6130.1 × 155.16.3
Razr 2022Galaxy Z Fold4Difference
Height167 mm155.1 mm+11.9 mm
Width79.8 mm130.1 mm−50.3 mm
Thickness7.6 mm6.3 mm+1.3 mm
Weight200 g263 g−63 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 2022 better than Galaxy Z Fold4?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  2. Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
  3. Selfie camera32 MP vs 4 MP8×
  4. Weight200 g vs 263 g+31%
  5. Pixel density393 ppi vs 373 ppi+5%
  6. Measured brightness1,033 nits vs 1,000 nits+3%
  7. Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS vs -28.3 LUFS+-10%

Why is Galaxy Z Fold4 better than Razr 2022?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
  2. Battery capacity3,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+26%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 2022: Yes
  5. Wireless chargingNo · Razr 2022: Yes
  6. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. 4K selfie videoNo · Razr 2022: Yes
  8. Screen size6.7″ vs 7.6″+13%
  9. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,812 px+68%
  10. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  11. Thickness7.6 mm vs 6.3 mm+21%
  12. Screen-to-body ratio81.3% vs 90.9%+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight200 g263 g
Thickness7.6 mm6.3 mm
Height167 mm155.1 mm
Width79.8 mm130.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP52IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2IPx8
Glass protection—Schott Ultra Thin Glas
ColoursSatin BlackGraygreen, Phantom Black, Beige, Burgundy
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size6.7″7.6″
PanelFoldable AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,812 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,176 px
Pixel density393 ppi373 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—1,200 nits
Measured brightness1,033 nits1,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio81.3%90.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.19 GHz3.19 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 730
AnTuTu score965,260964,530
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,9443,981
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,712
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP4 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity3,500 mAh4,400 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging30 W25 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video output—Yes
Ultra Wideband—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.4 LUFS-28.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—1.3 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 12L
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 6.1.1
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare