How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Magic V2

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Honor Magic V2

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (8) and where Magic V2 wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
8 advantages≈ $760
vs
Honor Magic V2
Honor · 2023Magic V2
7.6Score
14 advantages≈ $680
Higher score
6.2Display5.2
6.3Performance6.9
8.0Camera6.6
4.8Battery5.7
9.3Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldMagic V2
150.2 × 155.25.1145.4 × 156.74.7
Pixel 9 Pro FoldMagic V2Difference
Height155.2 mm156.7 mm−1.5 mm
Width150.2 mm145.4 mm+4.8 mm
Thickness5.1 mm4.7 mm+0.4 mm
Weight257 g231 g+26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than Magic V2?

  1. Measured brightness2,199 nits vs 933 nits2.4×
  2. Optical zoom5× vs 2.5×2×
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Magic V2: No
  4. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 1,600 nits+69%
  5. Active use (test)11.9 h vs 10.6 h+12%
  6. Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS vs -27.4 LUFS+-12%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
  8. USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%

Why is Magic V2 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. Wired charging21 W vs 66 W3.1×
  2. AnTuTu score1,222,228 vs 1,551,239+27%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+8%
  5. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620 vs 3,732+42%
  6. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  7. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783 vs 4,959+4%
  8. Weight257 g vs 231 g+11%
  9. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+8%
  10. Pixel density373 ppi vs 402 ppi+8%
  11. Charged in 30 min46% vs 75%+63%
  12. Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Magic V2Honor Magic V2≈ $6807.6
Design
Weight257 g231 g
Thickness5.1 mm4.7 mm
Height155.2 mm156.7 mm
Width150.2 mm145.4 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainBlack, Silk Black, Silk Purple, Gold
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size8″7.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,076 px2,156 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,344 px
Pixel density373 ppi402 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness2,199 nits933 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89%88.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 - Intl
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,222,2281,551,239
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,7834,959
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,6203,732
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.49"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×2.5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)11.9 h10.6 h
Wired charging21 W66 W
Charged in 30 min46%75%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYesYes
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS-27.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg0.85 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MagicOS 8
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare