- android.gs
- Compare
- 5 vs V29 Pro
Fairphone 5 vs Vivo V29 Pro
What 5 does better (8) and where V29 Pro wins (20) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
5V29 Pro
| 5 | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.2 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 188 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 5 better than V29 Pro?
- NFCYes · V29 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · V29 Pro: No
- Major OS updates promised5 vs 3+67%
- Memory card slotYes · V29 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · V29 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · V29 Pro: No
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
Why is V29 Pro better than 5?
- Wired charging30 W vs 80 W2.7×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Telephoto cameraNo · 5: Yes
- AnTuTu score584,498 vs 682,257+17%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,886 vs 3,999+39%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+10%
- Peak brightness880 nits vs 1,300 nits+48%
- Measured brightness772 nits vs 1,029 nits+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+15%
- Weight212 g vs 188 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP55 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Matte Black, Sky Blue, Transparent | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 880 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 772 nits | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 90.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm QCM6490 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 643 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 584,498 | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,886 | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -31 LUFS | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.4 W/kg | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | 3 |
