- android.gs
- Compare
- V20 Pro vs V29 Pro
Doogee V20 Pro vs Vivo V29 Pro
What V20 Pro does better (6) and where V29 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V20 ProV29 Pro
| V20 Pro | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.5 mm | 164.2 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 74.4 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 7.5 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Weight | 296 g | 188 g | +108 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V20 Pro better than V29 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+30%
- NFCYes · V29 Pro: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · V29 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V29 Pro: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V29 Pro better than V20 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,300 nits2.6×
- Telephoto cameraNo · V20 Pro: Yes
- Weight296 g vs 188 g+57%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V20 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Thickness14 mm vs 7.5 mm+87%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 453 ppi+11%
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 296 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 170.5 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Orange, Blue | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 72.1% | 90.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
