- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong Power 5 vs Camon 40
Cubot KingKong Power 5 vs Tecno Camon 40
What KingKong Power 5 does better (4) and where Camon 40 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display8.4
6.1Camera8.2
8.8Battery7.9
6.0Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong Power 5Camon 40
| KingKong Power 5 | Camon 40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 182.9 mm | 164.1 mm | +18.8 mm |
| Width | 83.9 mm | 74.6 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Thickness | 24.6 mm | 7.3 mm | +17.3 mm |
| Weight | 538 g | 177 g | +361 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Power 5 better than Camon 40?
- Battery capacity15,300 mAh vs 5,200 mAh2.9×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 40 better than KingKong Power 5?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Weight538 g vs 177 g3×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Power 5: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Power 5: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong Power 5: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 393 ppi+51%
- Thickness24.6 mm vs 7.3 mm3.4×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,300 nits+30%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Power 5: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 538 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 24.6 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 182.9 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 83.9 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Panda King Glass |
| Colours | Black | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.3% | 89.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 575,113 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 15,300 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 148 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
