- android.gs
- Compare
- Cool 30 Play vs Hot 50 Pro 4G
Coolpad Cool 30 Play vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
What Cool 30 Play does better (1) and where Hot 50 Pro 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display8.8
5.4Camera4.6
6.0Battery6.0
5.0Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cool 30 PlayHot 50 Pro 4G
| Cool 30 Play | Hot 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.6 mm | 167 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 190 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cool 30 Play better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Cool 30 Play?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,800 nits4×
- OLED panelNo · Cool 30 Play: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Cool 30 Play: Yes
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 393 ppi+49%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Cool 30 Play: Yes
- Weight208 g vs 190 g+9%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.4 mm+15%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 86.1%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 169.6 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Aurora Purple, Flowing Gold, Velvet Black | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 86.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 562,039 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,992 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Cool UI | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.66.7
vs
Infinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G7.66.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro6.76.6

