How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. BL9000 vs X200

Blackview BL9000 vs Vivo X200

What BL9000 does better (4) and where X200 wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Blackview BL9000
Blackview · 2024BL9000
8.8Score
4 advantages≈ $530
vs
Vivo X200
Vivo · 2024X200
9.5Score
19 advantages≈ $530
Higher score
6.6Display9.2
7.3Camera9.3
9.6Battery8.3
8.9Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

BL9000X200
82.6 × 179.51774.8 × 160.38
BL9000X200Difference
Height179.5 mm160.3 mm+19.2 mm
Width82.6 mm74.8 mm+7.8 mm
Thickness17 mm8 mm+9 mm
Weight413 g197 g+216 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BL9000 better than X200?

  1. Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+52%
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  3. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is X200 better than BL9000?

  1. Peak brightness600 nits vs 4,500 nits7.5×
  2. Weight413 g vs 197 g2.1×
  3. OLED panelNo · BL9000: Yes
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  5. Optical stabilisationNo · BL9000: Yes
  6. Telephoto cameraNo · BL9000: Yes
  7. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  8. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+40%
  9. Thickness17 mm vs 8 mm2.1×
  10. Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
  11. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  12. 4K selfie videoNo · BL9000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Blackview BL9000Blackview BL9000≈ $5308.8
Vivo X200Vivo X200≈ $5309.5
Design
Weight413 g197 g
Thickness17 mm8 mm
Height179.5 mm160.3 mm
Width82.6 mm74.8 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusSchott Xensation Alpha
ColoursRose Gold, Interstellar BlackNatural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelIPS LCDAMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,460 px2,800 px
Pixel density396 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,563 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.6%89.6%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUMali-G77 MC9Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score—2,632,874
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,014
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,334
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.57"1/1.56"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity8,800 mAh5,800 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—78%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.15.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle87 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare