- android.gs
- Compare
- BL8800 Pro vs Moto G200 5G
Blackview BL8800 Pro vs Motorola Moto G200 5G
What BL8800 Pro does better (3) and where Moto G200 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Display7.6
5.8Camera7.6
8.5Battery6.0
7.6Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
BL8800 ProMoto G200 5G
| BL8800 Pro | Moto G200 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.2 mm | 168.1 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 75.5 mm | +8 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8.9 mm | +8.8 mm |
| Weight | 367 g | 202 g | +165 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BL8800 Pro better than Moto G200 5G?
- Battery capacity8,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+68%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Moto G200 5G better than BL8800 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight367 g vs 202 g+82%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.99 GHz+36%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · BL8800 Pro: Yes
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+99%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
- Screen-to-body ratio70.9% vs 86.5%+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 367 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 176.2 mm | 168.1 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 558 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.9% | 86.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.99 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 682,346 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,319 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,380 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 31% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
