12% pricier ≈ $750
- AnTuTu score 2,995,695 vs 2,609,095
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,637 vs 8,152
- Optical zoom 5× vs 3.7×
- Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 4,500 nits
- 4K video frame rate 60 fps vs 120 fps
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Vivo X200 Pro
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Vivo X200 Pro
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the X200 Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the X200 Pro
6% cheaper ≈ $630
- AnTuTu score 2,967,184 vs 2,609,095
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,598 vs 8,152
- Wired charging 100 W vs 90 W
- Optical stabilisation
- Battery capacity 5,650 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
Same price ≈ $650
- RAM 24 GB vs 16 GB
- AnTuTu score 2,701,464 vs 2,609,095
- Battery capacity 6,150 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
- Peak brightness 2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Wireless charging
6% pricier ≈ $710
- Wireless charging power 80 W vs 30 W
- Optical zoom 5× vs 3.7×
- Rear cameras 4 vs 2
- AnTuTu score 2,014,262 vs 2,609,095
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
7% cheaper ≈ $620
- Weight 199 g vs 223 g
- Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
- Wireless charging power 50 W vs 30 W
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Wired charging 66 W vs 90 W
Same price ≈ $660
- Pixel density 517 ppi vs 452 ppi
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx9 vs IPx8
- Selfie camera 50 MP vs 32 MP
- AnTuTu score 2,152,790 vs 2,609,095
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
12% cheaper ≈ $590
- Wired charging 100 W vs 90 W
- Wireless charging power 80 W vs 30 W
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- AnTuTu score 2,237,843 vs 2,609,095
- Battery capacity 5,300 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
4% pricier ≈ $700
- Active use (test) 16.8 h vs 15.2 h
- Weight 181 g vs 223 g
- Selfie camera 50 MP vs 32 MP
- AnTuTu score 1,378,614 vs 2,609,095
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,208 vs 8,152
Same price ≈ $660
- AnTuTu score 2,779,129 vs 2,609,095
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,705 vs 8,152
- Weight 187 g vs 223 g
- Battery capacity 5,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
- Optical zoom 3× vs 3.7×
Same price ≈ $690
- Wired charging 100 W vs 90 W
- Optical zoom 4.3× vs 3.7×
- Charged in 30 min 125% vs 73%
- Battery capacity 5,400 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
- AnTuTu score 2,432,004 vs 2,609,095