android.gs
Compare
300 Ultra vs X200 Pro

Honor 300 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro

What 300 Ultra does better (8) and where X200 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024300 Ultra

9.5Score

8 advantages≈ $590

Vivo · 2024X200 Pro

9.6Score

14 advantages≈ $670

Higher score

9.3Display9.1

8.8Performance9.2

9.6Camera9.7

9.5Battery8.9

8.3Features9.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

300 UltraX200 Pro

	300 Ultra	X200 Pro	Difference
Height	163.8 mm	162.4 mm	+1.4 mm
Width	75.3 mm	76 mm	−0.7 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.2 mm	=
Weight	198 g	223 g	−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 300 Ultra better than X200 Pro?

Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
Wireless charging power80 W vs 30 W2.7×
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Weight198 g vs 223 g+13%
Optical zoom3.8× vs 3.7×+3%
Charged in 30 min118% vs 73%+62%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is X200 Pro better than 300 Ultra?

AnTuTu score2,237,843 vs 2,609,095+17%
Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+13%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,702 vs 8,152+22%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+21%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
eSIMNo · 300 Ultra: Yes
Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+12%
Pixel density437 ppi vs 452 ppi+3%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 300 Ultra≈ $5909.5	Vivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight	198 g	223 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.2 mm
Height	163.8 mm	162.4 mm
Width	75.3 mm	76 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	Giant rhino glass	Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)
Colours	Black, White	Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,700 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	437 ppi	452 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,000 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,881 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.4%	90.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3.63 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score	2,237,843	2,609,095
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,702	8,152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,173
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/2	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.28"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.8×	3.7×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,300 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	15.2 h
Wired charging	100 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	118%	73%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	80 W	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite messaging	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised	—	4