How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Reno13 vs X200 Pro

OPPO Reno13 vs Vivo X200 Pro

What Reno13 does better (4) and where X200 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno13
OPPO · 2024Reno13
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $700
vs
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
18 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
8.1Display9.1
8.1Performance9.2
9.1Camera9.7
8.8Battery8.9
9.5Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno13X200 Pro
74.7 × 157.97.276 × 162.48.2
Reno13X200 ProDifference
Height157.9 mm162.4 mm−4.5 mm
Width74.7 mm76 mm−1.3 mm
Thickness7.2 mm8.2 mm−1 mm
Weight181 g223 g−42 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno13 better than X200 Pro?

  1. Active use (test)16.8 h vs 15.2 h+11%
  2. Weight181 g vs 223 g+23%
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
  4. Thickness7.2 mm vs 8.2 mm+14%

Why is X200 Pro better than Reno13?

  1. AnTuTu score1,378,614 vs 2,609,095+89%
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,208 vs 8,152+94%
  3. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits3.8×
  4. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,868 vs 6,1732.2×
  5. Telephoto cameraNo · Reno13: Yes
  6. Wireless chargingNo · Reno13: Yes
  7. Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+7%
  8. Measured brightness1,204 nits vs 1,881 nits+56%
  9. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  10. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  11. Max video4K vs 8K
  12. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Reno13OPPO Reno13≈ $7009.3
Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight181 g223 g
Thickness7.2 mm8.2 mm
Height157.9 mm162.4 mm
Width74.7 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iScratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)
ColoursPlume White, Luminous Blue, Black, Purple, BlueCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,256 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,760 px2,800 px
Pixel density460 ppi452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness1,204 nits1,881 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8350Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.35 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUMali G615-MC6Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score1,378,6142,609,095
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,2088,152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,8686,173
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.28"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,600 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)16.8 h15.2 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—73%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—30 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.7 LUFS-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 15Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,600—
Endurance per cycle64 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare