12% cheaper ≈ $350
- Wired charging 45 W vs 25 W
- Telephoto camera
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- AnTuTu score 1,158,987 vs 1,400,594
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Galaxy Z Flip6 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Galaxy Z Flip6
10% pricier ≈ $440
- Wired charging 70 W vs 25 W
- Battery capacity 5,750 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- Measured brightness 573 nits vs 1,475 nits
- Major OS updates promised 2 vs 7
35% pricier ≈ $540
- Wired charging 45 W vs 25 W
- Telephoto camera
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Major OS updates promised 3 vs 7
- AnTuTu score 1,140,567 vs 1,400,594
10% pricier ≈ $440
- Optical zoom 5× vs 2×
- Battery capacity 4,821 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- AnTuTu score 859,865 vs 1,400,594
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,833 vs 6,265
37% pricier ≈ $540
- Wired charging 68 W vs 25 W
- AnTuTu score 1,831,189 vs 1,400,594
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Weight 199 g vs 187 g
- USB version 2 vs 3.2
32% pricier ≈ $530
- CPU cores 10 vs 8
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
23% pricier ≈ $490
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Telephoto camera
- Battery capacity 4,400 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- AnTuTu score 1,250,358 vs 1,400,594
- Major OS updates promised 4 vs 7
5% cheaper ≈ $380
- Wired charging 33 W vs 25 W
- Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Selfie camera 32 MP vs 10 MP
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
73% pricier ≈ $690
- Wired charging 66 W vs 25 W
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- Battery capacity 4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Wireless charging
- eSIM
33% cheaper ≈ $270
- Wired charging 33 W vs 25 W
- Battery capacity 4,310 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Pixel density 439 ppi vs 426 ppi
- Optical stabilisation
- Wireless charging