How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Motorola Moto E30
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Motorola Moto E30

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Moto E30 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Motorola Moto E30
Motorola · 2021
Moto E30
6.5″Unisoc T7005,000 mAh48 MP
approx. price≈ $170
4.4

Alternatives to the Moto E30

Tecno Camon 17
1
Tecno · 2021Camon 17
4.8
Same price ≈ $170
  • RAM 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 18 W vs 10 W
Samsung Galaxy M12
2
Samsung · 2021Galaxy M12
4.5
6% pricier ≈ $180
  • RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 15 W vs 10 W
  • Weight 212 g vs 198 g
  • Main camera aperture f/2 vs f/1.8
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
3
Samsung · 2021Galaxy A22 5G
5.9
Same price ≈ $170
  • RAM 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 15 W vs 10 W
  • Weight 203 g vs 198 g
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
5
Xiaomi · 2021Redmi Note 8 2021
4.4
Same price ≈ $170
  • RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 18 W vs 10 W
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 90 Hz
LG W41
6
LG · 2021W41
4.8
Same price ≈ $170
  • RAM 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 64 GB vs 32 GB
  • CPU frequency 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Thickness 9.3 mm vs 9.1 mm
Samsung Galaxy A12 (India)
7
Samsung · 2021Galaxy A12 (India)
4.6
Same price ≈ $170
  • RAM 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 15 W vs 10 W
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Weight 205 g vs 198 g
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
8
Samsung · 2021Galaxy A32 5G
5.1
Same price ≈ $170
  • RAM 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 15 W vs 10 W
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Weight 205 g vs 198 g
Samsung Galaxy F22
9
Samsung · 2021Galaxy F22
6.1
6% pricier ≈ $180
  • RAM 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 32 GB
  • Wired charging 15 W vs 10 W
  • Weight 203 g vs 198 g
  • Thickness 9.4 mm vs 9.1 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare