- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto E30 vs Galaxy A22 5G
Motorola Moto E30 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
What Moto E30 does better (1) and where Galaxy A22 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display4.3
3.9Camera5.3
3.5Battery4.0
2.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto E30Galaxy A22 5G
| Moto E30 | Galaxy A22 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.1 mm | 167.2 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 203 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto E30 better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Weight198 g vs 203 g+3%
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Moto E30?
- RAM2 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- 5GNo · Moto E30: Yes
- NFCNo · Moto E30: Yes
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 399 ppi+48%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto E30: Yes
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 165.1 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Mineral gray, Digital blue | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 385 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 82.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 242,155 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,913 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.26 W/kg | 0.73 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto E30vsXiaomi Redmi Note 8 20214.44.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G5.95.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro5.95.9
