How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Honor Magic V3
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Honor Magic V3

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Magic V3 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Honor Magic V3
Honor · 2024
Magic V3
7.9″Snapdragon 8 Gen 35,150 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $1,100
8.2

Alternatives to the Magic V3

Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
1
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Fold 4
9.2
11% pricier ≈ $1,250
  • AnTuTu score 1,991,672 vs 1,589,991
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.5×
  • 4K selfie video
  • eSIM
Vivo X Fold3
2
Vivo · 2024X Fold3
8.8
12% cheaper ≈ $970
  • Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
  • Wired charging 80 W vs 66 W
  • Wireless charging
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 3.5×
Honor Magic Vs3
3
Honor · 2024Magic Vs3
8.7
4% cheaper ≈ $1,050
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.5×
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
  • CPU frequency 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
ZTE Nubia Fold
4
ZTE · 2025Nubia Fold
8.2
Same price ≈ $1,100
  • Battery capacity 6,560 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
  • CPU frequency 4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Max video 8K vs 4K
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx8
Vivo X Fold5
5
Vivo · 2025X Fold5
9.0
17% cheaper ≈ $920
  • Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • AnTuTu score 1,883,303 vs 1,589,991
  • Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
  • 4K selfie video
  • eSIM
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
6
Google · 2025Pixel 10 Pro Fold
8.5
16% cheaper ≈ $930
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.5×
  • CPU frequency 3.78 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Wired charging 30 W vs 66 W
  • Battery capacity 5,015 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
7
Xiaomi · 2023Mix Fold 3
8.3
12% pricier ≈ $1,250
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3.5×
  • Max video 8K vs 4K
  • Measured brightness 1,277 nits vs 1,076 nits
  • AnTuTu score 1,235,547 vs 1,589,991
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,797 vs 6,461
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
8
Xiaomi · 2025Mix Flip 2
8.7
29% cheaper ≈ $780
  • Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • CPU frequency 4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Max video 8K vs 4K
  • Telephoto camera
  • eSIM
Xiaomi Mix Flip
9
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip
8.1
35% cheaper ≈ $720
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
  • Active use (test) 12 h vs 10.1 h
  • Measured brightness 1,314 nits vs 1,076 nits
  • Wireless charging
  • Battery capacity 4,780 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
10
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Fold7
8.1
14% cheaper ≈ $950
  • Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • AnTuTu score 1,995,132 vs 1,589,991
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,152 vs 6,461
  • Wired charging 25 W vs 66 W
  • Battery capacity 4,400 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare