How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Magic V3

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Honor Magic V3

What Pixel 10 Pro Fold does better (6) and where Magic V3 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Google · 2025Pixel 10 Pro Fold
8.5Score
6 advantages≈ $930
Higher score
vs
Honor Magic V3
Honor · 2024Magic V3
8.2Score
13 advantages≈ $1,100
7.5Display5.6
7.6Performance7.5
8.0Camera8.6
6.7Battery6.8
9.3Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 10 Pro FoldMagic V3
150.4 × 155.25.2145.3 × 156.64.4
Pixel 10 Pro FoldMagic V3Difference
Height155.2 mm156.6 mm−1.4 mm
Width150.4 mm145.3 mm+5.1 mm
Thickness5.2 mm4.4 mm+0.9 mm
Weight258 g226 g+32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 10 Pro Fold better than Magic V3?

  1. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits+67%
  2. Optical zoom5× vs 3.5×+43%
  3. CPU frequency3.78 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+15%
  4. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
  5. Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%
  6. USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%

Why is Magic V3 better than Pixel 10 Pro Fold?

  1. Wired charging30 W vs 66 W2.2×
  2. Battery capacity5,015 mAh vs 5,150 mAh+3%
  3. AnTuTu score1,553,009 vs 1,589,991+2%
  4. Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,173 vs 6,461+5%
  6. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  7. Selfie camera10 MP vs 20 MP2×
  8. Weight258 g vs 226 g+14%
  9. Pixel density374 ppi vs 402 ppi+7%
  10. Charged in 30 min50% vs 82%+64%
  11. Thickness5.2 mm vs 4.4 mm+20%
  12. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.6+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Magic V3Honor Magic V3≈ $1,1008.2
Design
Weight258 g226 g
Thickness5.2 mm4.4 mm
Height155.2 mm156.6 mm
Width150.4 mm145.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus 2King Kong Rhinoceros
ColoursMoonstone, JadeVelvet Black, Snow, Tundra Green, Red
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size8″7.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,076 px2,156 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,344 px
Pixel density374 ppi402 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,800 nits
Measured brightness—1,076 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.4%88.6%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G5Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.78 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUPowerVR DXT-48-1536Adreno 750
AnTuTu score1,553,0091,589,991
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,1736,461
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,759
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.6
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×3.5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,015 mAh5,150 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—10.1 h
Wired charging30 W66 W
Charged in 30 min50%82%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W50 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYesYes
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-28.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MagicOS 9
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle48 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare