How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic V3 vs Mix Fold 3

Honor Magic V3 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 3

What Magic V3 does better (12) and where Mix Fold 3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic V3
Honor · 2024Magic V3
8.2Score
12 advantages≈ $1,100
vs
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Xiaomi · 2023Mix Fold 3
8.3Score
6 advantages≈ $1,250
Higher score
5.6Display4.6
7.5Performance6.5
8.6Camera9.8
6.8Battery8.3
8.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V3Mix Fold 3
145.3 × 156.64.4143.3 × 161.25.3
Magic V3Mix Fold 3Difference
Height156.6 mm161.2 mm−4.6 mm
Width145.3 mm143.3 mm+2 mm
Thickness4.4 mm5.3 mm−1 mm
Weight226 g255 g−29 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V3 better than Mix Fold 3?

  1. AnTuTu score1,589,991 vs 1,235,547+29%
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,461 vs 4,797+35%
  3. Battery capacity5,150 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+7%
  4. Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,300 nits+38%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · Mix Fold 3: No
  6. eSIMYes · Mix Fold 3: No
  7. Weight226 g vs 255 g+13%
  8. Pixel density402 ppi vs 360 ppi+12%
  9. Thickness4.4 mm vs 5.3 mm+22%
  10. Resolution (width)2,156 px vs 1,916 px+13%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
  12. Charged in 30 min82% vs 75%+9%

Why is Mix Fold 3 better than Magic V3?

  1. Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
  2. Max video4K vs 8K
  3. Measured brightness1,076 nits vs 1,277 nits+19%
  4. Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
  5. Loudspeaker loudness-28.3 LUFS vs -26 LUFS+-8%
  6. USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Magic V3Honor Magic V3≈ $1,1008.2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3Xiaomi Mix Fold 3≈ $1,2508.3
Design
Weight226 g255 g
Thickness4.4 mm5.3 mm
Height156.6 mm161.2 mm
Width145.3 mm143.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionKing Kong Rhinoceros—
ColoursVelvet Black, Snow, Tundra Green, RedBlack, Gold
StylusYes—
Display
Screen size7.9″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO OLED+
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,156 px1,916 px
Resolution (height)2,344 px2,160 px
Pixel density402 ppi360 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits1,300 nits
Measured brightness1,076 nits1,277 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.6%89.4%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,589,9911,235,547
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,4614,797
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,759—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras34
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×5×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,150 mAh4,800 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)10.1 h—
Wired charging66 W67 W
Charged in 30 min82%75%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-28.3 LUFS-26 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 9HyperOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare