- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi Note 12S vs Blade V50 Vita
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S vs ZTE Blade V50 Vita
What Redmi Note 12S does better (13) and where Blade V50 Vita wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display5.1
7.1Camera4.6
6.0Battery6.5
6.2Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi Note 12SBlade V50 Vita
| Redmi Note 12S | Blade V50 Vita | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 167.4 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 204 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi Note 12S better than Blade V50 Vita?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- OLED panelYes · Blade V50 Vita: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Blade V50 Vita: No
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 260 ppi+57%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+28%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V50 Vita: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight176 g vs 204 g+16%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Blade V50 Vita better than Redmi Note 12S?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.5% vs 86.5%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 176 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Onyx Black, Ice Blue, Pearl Green | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 631 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 86.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 493,222 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,518 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 326 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 14 | — |
